fish is fucking meat, you fucking nimrods... so is fucking chicken.
fish is fucking meat, you fucking nimrods... so is fucking chicken.
fish is fucking meat, you fucking nimrods... so is fucking chicken.
quote:
NOT ALL SUSHI IS RAW.
I know.
i just don't care for the preparation methods.
I'm not big on Japanese food.
I'd rather have Korean or Vietnamese or Thai if I'm gonna go Asian.
quote:
I lived in Vancouver, right on the coast, for two years, where I could get beautiful fresh fish for it.I still don't like it.
*gag*
I'll take my fish cooked please.
You can have cooked sushi, silly!
I just... yeah... pass.
I want Pho. I miss living in Van just because I miss eating Pho.
quote:
I knoooooooooooooow.I just... yeah... pass.
I want Pho. I miss living in Van just because I miss eating Pho.
2 of my best friends are Vietnamese and they make the best Pho!
quote:dunno. just is.quote:
sushi is actually banned here.For what reason?!
quote:
I knoooooooooooooow.I just... yeah... pass.
I want Pho. I miss living in Van just because I miss eating Pho.
i had pho for lunch today and you can find sushi places all over japan that you can eat off a woman it usually costs about 200 dollars extra for the naked woman....not worth it at all
quote:quote:
that's masumi i think, i can't tell the pic is too bigAre you crazy! Doesn't even come close to lookin like her. =Þ
And no, never ate sushi off of a naked body. I'm open for the experience though!
lol i was high when i saw that i'm not seeing clearly! lol anyways, i have ate sushi off a naked body, and it was masumi's HAHA
Well, if fish isn't meat, then exactly what is it? Is it a PLANT? Because it doesn't seem to be a plant to me. And it isn't a kind of fungus, or mushroom, or lichen, or bacteria, or any of that sort of stuff. No. It is an animal. Fish is an animal. Now, read if you will the definition of animal...
Animal: 1. A sentient living organism typically capable of voluntary motion and sensation: distinguised from plant.
Now, that certainly includes fish, doesn't it. Now, with that fact in mind, read the definition of meat...
Meat: 1. The flesh of animals used as food, esp. the flesh of mammals as opposed to fish or fowl. 2. The edible part of anything. 3. Anything eaten for nourishment, as in meat and drink.
Okay. Well, except for the part of it that says "esp. the flesh of mammals as opposed to fish or foul," (see below) that pretty much sums it up. Fish is meat, yessiree. It fits definitions 2 and 3 perfectly.
Now about number 1. That part was forced into the dictionary by a group of people I have come to call "The Fish/Meat Conspirators." They are trying to confuse the entire world by telling us that fish is fish. Well beef is beef. But beef is still meat, isn't it??? I don't think there is really much purpose to what they are doing. I think that they just got bored one day and said to themselves, let's start a conspiracy. So they did. They phoned every single dictionary in the world and made them do 2 things by threatening to invent a lot of new words to make the people who work there actually have to do something. That's how the word "Antidisestablishmentarianism" came about. But all these new words eventually got to be too much of a hassle, so they changed the definitions of "meat" and "fish".
So that is why it says "esp. the flesh of mammals as opposed to fish or foul". But it says "esp." which means especially. It doesn't say that fish and foul aren't included. It just means that it is ESPECIALLY the flesh of a mammal. It does NOT say ONLY the flesh of mammals. Get my point here? The makers of the dictionary were nice enough to leave that little clause in. Say thank you to the makers of your dictionary. (BTW, there are also Foul/Meat Conspirators, which explains the foul part in case you were wondering. Perhaps one of you will accept the task of making a webpage for this worthy cause. And also the Nut/Meat Conspirators, who would have us think that nuts ARE meat, is in need of a webpage. E-Mail me at ctgreen@trillian.bbs42.com if you do, so I can link it to this page).
Okay. I said they also changed the definition of fish. Well, here it is.
Fish: 1. A vertebrate, cold-blooded aquatic animal [told ya it was an animal] with permanent gills having a typically elongate, tapering body, usu. covered with scales and provided with fins for locomotion 2. Loosely, any animal habitually living in water. 3. The flesh of fish used as food .
Well. Wasn't number 3 nice of them? But I don't disagree with this fact. See, let us momentarily use the word fishmeat instead of fish, definition number 3. I will use the word fish only to mean fish, as it is defined by definition number 1.
Beef: the flesh of a cow used as food.
Pork: the flesh of a pig used as food.
Venison: the flesh of a deer used as food.
Fishmeat: the flesh of a fish used as meat.
Now, nobody will dispute that the first three are meat. But what about the fourth. Fishmeat. Well, let us call fishmeat fish again. Do people think that fish is not meat, simply because the name the meat is called (e.g. beef, pork, venison...), just so happens to be the same as the name of the animal? Well, this is just silly. If we were to call beef cow instead of beef, would it make cow not a type of meat? Come on people. Fish and fish are two different words which just happen to have the same spelling. And if you are going to say that fish is just fish because of this, then you also have to say that beef is not meat, it's just beef. So, meat wouldn't even exist would it. I suppose this would make vegetarians happy...
Finally, what is to become of such sayings as "Red wine with meat, white wine with fish"????? (which were made up by the Fish/Meat Conspirators no doubt). Well, they will stick around and confuse us. This saying tells us that if we eat fish, which is also meat, we need to have red AND white wine. Well, that may not be a bad thing.

