Loading ...
RateMyBody Forums --> Sports --> Premiership Talk Pt. 2
Jump To
Replies: 393
1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  
                   

SomeJaseGuy

Online
45429 posts
Posted: 4/30/2008 3:38:27 AM
quote:

nobody knows more about football that jase.


SomeJaseGuy

Online
45429 posts
Posted: 4/30/2008 3:47:10 AM
i wont even be able to watch it live... gotta record it and watch it tonight

Inamorato

Offline
11000 posts
Posted: 4/30/2008 3:50:21 AM
quote:

i wont even be able to watch it live... gotta record it and watch it tonight

Dont worry, Ill keep you posted.


SomeJaseGuy

Online
45429 posts
Posted: 4/30/2008 4:04:34 AM
quote:

quote:

i wont even be able to watch it live... gotta record it and watch it tonight

Dont worry, Ill keep you posted.



yeah cuz i'll be sure to check here for updates........

SomeJaseGuy

Online
45429 posts
Posted: 4/30/2008 4:05:07 AM
quote:

a few points:

giggs was a liability. he gave the ball away more than gerrard in a bad game.

lionel messi should not be playing football. i don't understand why he isn't banned.

benitez has no excuse not to win. for a team that only concentrates on the champions league, they will have egg on their faces if they finish 4th with nothing after spending like an arab in a brothel.



the riise goal is gonna be tough to overcome. chelsea play as boring as us.

SomeJaseGuy

Online
45429 posts
Posted: 4/30/2008 4:23:16 AM
if they paid their players more they'd stay on the continent and english teams wouldn't dominate so much.

Inamorato

Offline
11000 posts
Posted: 4/30/2008 4:34:13 AM
Yeah well said Jasenko.

The guy writes a monologue, about his theory on the current status of the globalisation of European football, and all you come up with is "well the something should pay them more money". That something is not even mentioned. Nor is who is paying more.

Not even considering the economics behind the European clubs, or their respective tax structure.

But yeah "they should pay them more", is good enough I guess.


SomeJaseGuy

Online
45429 posts
Posted: 4/30/2008 5:56:49 AM
quote:

Yeah well said Jasenko.

The guy writes a monologue, about his theory on the current status of the globalisation of European football, and all you come up with is "well the something should pay them more money". That something is not even mentioned. Nor is who is paying more.

Not even considering the economics behind the European clubs, or their respective tax structure.

But yeah "they should pay them more", is good enough I guess.



dude you are seriously retarded

SomeJaseGuy

Online
45429 posts
Posted: 4/30/2008 5:59:13 AM
quote:

real madrid can buy any players they want and so can barcelona but that's part of the problem, i reckon. like buying david beckham. real never made such a big hit off one player as they did with beckham in terms of merchandise etc. the spanish clubs forgot about the football and that's why they suck dick at the moment.


german clubs are complete shit now. they really do not stand a chance in europe. italian teams are okay with talent but boring as fuck and nobody really likes them cept italians. spanish clubs would rather look good than win. then you have all the marginal countries like france, portugal, scotland where the clubs do not have the media coverage or money to keep their top players who seem to always end up in england.

SomeJaseGuy

Online
45429 posts
Posted: 4/30/2008 6:13:44 AM
poor mans chelsea.. hmm.

chelsea:

First Division/Premier League: 3
1954–55, 2004–05, 2005–06

FA Cup: 4
1970, 1997, 2000, 2007

League Cup: 4
1965, 1998, 2005, 2007

UEFA Cup Winners' Cup: 2
1971, 1998

European Super Cup: 1
1998

Liverpool:

League:
Winners (18)
1900–01, 1905–06, 1921–22, 1922–23, 1946–47, 1963–64, 1965–66, 1972–73, 1975–76, 1976–77, 1978–79, 1979–80, 1981–82, 1982–83, 1983–84, 1985–86, 1987–88, 1989–90
Runners-up (11):
1898–89, 1909–10, 1968–69, 1973–74, 1974–75, 1977–78, 1984–85, 1986–87, 1988–89, 1990–91, 2001–02

FA Cup
Winners (7):
1965, 1974, 1986, 1989, 1992, 2001, 2006
Runners-up (6):
1914, 1950, 1971, 1977, 1988, 1996

League Cup
Winners (7):
1981, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1995, 2001, 2003
Runners-up (3):
1978, 1987, 2005

European Cup and UEFA Champions League
Winners (5):
1977, 1978, 1981, 1984, 2005
Runners-up (2):
1985, 2007

UEFA Cup
Winners (3):
1973, 1976, 2001

UEFA Super Cup
Winners (3):
1977, 2001, 2005
Runners-up (2):
1978, 1984

UEFA Cup Winners' Cup
Runners-up (1):
1966


RambleOn

Online
1577 posts
Posted: 4/30/2008 3:21:34 PM

SomeJaseGuy

Online
45429 posts
Posted: 4/30/2008 3:46:48 PM
it was pretty entertaining
i figured the riise goal would be the difference but it was nice to see some goals.

who woulda thought this matchup would produce 7 goals and man u barca would produce 1 goal

cech is a horrible gk.


SomeJaseGuy

Online
45429 posts
Posted: 4/30/2008 3:50:23 PM
Grant declares: 'We did it my way'
at least he concedes they were lucky

Inamorato

Offline
11000 posts
Posted: 4/30/2008 5:19:46 PM
quote:
cech is a horrible gk.

Really? Thats funny, because as I recall it was two goals to the near post of one particular goalkeeper.

One fundamental rule in goalkeeping is, always cover your near post.


Inamorato

Offline
11000 posts
Posted: 5/1/2008 5:44:42 AM
So Jasenko, any thoughts on the match?

Or are you too pissed off to talk about it?


SomeJaseGuy

Online
45429 posts
Posted: 5/1/2008 6:31:54 AM
we can't make the final every year.

SomeJaseGuy

Online
45429 posts
Posted: 5/1/2008 10:45:30 AM
quote:

i suppose not, not even if you only concentrate on one competition every year and buy £20 million strikers.


4th place and CL semi's isn't a bad year, honestly.
theres hundreds of clubs who would love to do that.
and we're not the first club to spend $20m on a player.

we just have a shit manager... nothin i can do about that


SomeJaseGuy

Online
45429 posts
Posted: 5/1/2008 10:45:49 AM
and riise was bought by chelsea to score that goal

SomeJaseGuy

Online
45429 posts
Posted: 5/1/2008 1:55:54 PM
you're wrong about the money spent being worth it for chelsea.


Chelsea

2004
carvalho 19.85m
drogba 24m
kezman 5m
robben 9m
cech 9m
ferreira 13.2m

2005
essien 24.4m
wright-phillips 21m
del horno 8m

2006
Kalou 8m
Shevchenko 30m
Mikel- 16m


total on these players alone

187.45m

and you're crying about liverpool spending 20m on 1 player
seriously?


SomeJaseGuy

Online
45429 posts
Posted: 5/1/2008 1:57:03 PM
quote:

how many leagues has liverpool won in the 21st century? they need to be renamed Benfica.


gets hard to win the league when we don't have the 200m chelsea do to spend on players.
how many have anyone but arsenal and man u won?