Saturday, July 26, 2008
SomeJaseGuy
he just rips on everyone who has one
prolly a bolton supporter in hiding or something
L0ver
SJC1
quote:
you can't have a balanced view on this subject, jase. that's my point. you talk about chelsea buying championships yet they are nearly pwning man utd after having spent fuck all this season.
Chelsea spent 40million quid!!!! wtf u on about
L0ver
L0ver
quote:quote:
you can't have a balanced view on this subject, jase. that's my point. you talk about chelsea buying championships yet they are nearly pwning man utd after having spent fuck all this season.
Chelsea spent 40million quid!!!! wtf u on about
they sold robben for 20+, bought a couple of players for less than 10 and then bought anelka for 15. loads of players on free.
compare than to man u and liverpool and you don't have any case whatsoever.
SomeJaseGuy
compare chelseas spending over the last 4 years to man u and liverpool
and you dont even have a case
SJC1
quote:quote:quote:
you can't have a balanced view on this subject, jase. that's my point. you talk about chelsea buying championships yet they are nearly pwning man utd after having spent fuck all this season.
Chelsea spent 40million quid!!!! wtf u on about
they sold robben for 20+, bought a couple of players for less than 10 and then bought anelka for 15. loads of players on free.compare than to man u and liverpool and you don't have any case whatsoever.
your man utd list includes Rooney who they bought years ago and carrick who they brought a couple of years ago so man utd and chelseas spending this seaon is very comparable
its you who has no case!
Inamorato
Chelsea wont be able to continue to spend like Arabs every year, and pay their players £120,000 a week forever. They are running at a loss EVERY YEAR. Because of their wage structure. Not to mention the amount they spend on transfers. Eventually this will breakdown. Collapse. Probably not like Leeds, but it will stop. And when it does, they will be nowhere.
Liverpool will be spending their money on a new stadium, it seems their owners, though big tight arses, have some business model.
Man Utd are in massive debt, but are lucky they have a massive fan base. But still, they will need to spend a lot in the next 2 years to replace the old guard. Not to mention Rio in 3-4 years.
Arsenal is the only club, by the time this all happens, will have their stadium paid off, and the income from the property development at Highbury, which will net them well over £100m. They will be the richest club in the world, and have a team that will be basically peaking.
That my friend, is a viable business model. And it was never on the back off a billionaire. But sound management, both on and off the pitch.
All while playing idealistic football.
Edited by - Inamorato on 5/2/2008 6:29:21 PM
SomeJaseGuy
L0ver
quote:
dude
compare chelseas spending over the last 4 years to man u and liverpool
and you dont even have a case
lets talk about this season. liverpool and man utd spent more. end of story.
chelsea is joint top.
SomeJaseGuy
quote:quote:
dude
compare chelseas spending over the last 4 years to man u and liverpool
and you dont even have a caselets talk about this season. liverpool and man utd spent more. end of story.
chelsea is joint top.
god damn your arguments suck lately
L0ver
quote:your man utd list includes Rooney who they bought years ago and carrick who they brought a couple of years ago so man utd and chelseas spending this seaon is very comparable
its you who has no case!
nani, anderson, hargreaves (47 million)
all this season. all exceed chelsea pending.
get your maths right.
SJC1
L0ver
quote:
They are toughing it out. And they are succeeding.Chelsea wont be able to continue to spend like Arabs every year, and pay their players £120,000 a week forever. They are running at a loss EVERY YEAR. Because of their wage structure. Not to mention the amount they spend on transfers. Eventually this will breakdown. Collapse. Probably not like Leeds, but it will stop. And when it does, they will be nowhere.
Liverpool will be spending their money on a new stadium, it seems their owners, though big tight arses, have some business model.
Man Utd are in massive debt, but are lucky they have a massive fan base. But still, they will need to spend a lot in the next 2 years to replace the old guard. Not to mention Rio in 3-4 years.
Arsenal is the only club, by the time this all happens, will have their stadium paid off, and the income from the property development at Highbury, which will net them well over £100m. They will be the richest club in the world, and have a team that will be basically peaking.
That my friend, is a viable business model. And it was never on the back off a billionaire. But sound management, both on and off the pitch.
Edited by - Inamorato on 5/2/2008 6:27:40 PM
business models mean fuck all when you are worth 24 billion dollars.
business models also mean fuck all when you win nothing.
SJC1
L0ver
quote:god damn your arguments suck lately
i am the only voice of reson when it comes to football in this forum. you all talk bollocks.
L0ver
quote:
next u will say u cant win anything with kids
i'm not alan hansen.
SomeJaseGuy
quote:quote:god damn your arguments suck lately
i am the only voice of reson when it comes to football in this forum. you all talk bollocks.
Don't have children
i will eat them
L0ver
Inamorato
quote:
business models mean fuck all when you are worth 24 billion dollars.business models also mean fuck all when you win nothing.
Yes it does, because it will collapse, dont you understand that?
They wont be constantly shoving money into the system. And within 5 years it will be OVER. Not now, but within 5 years.
